U.S.: Worker says Amazon hung anti-union signs in bathroom stalls

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


“No place was off limits,” said warehouse employee Jennifer Bates, who testified at a Washington hearing on income inequality

When Amazon found out that its workers were trying to form a union, the company put up signs across the warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, including in bathroom stalls, a worker said.

“No place was off limits,” said warehouse employee Jennifer Bates, who testified at a Washington hearing on income inequality.

Ms. Bates, who supports the unionising effort, described on March 17 how Amazon is pushing back against the biggest unionisation efforts at the company since its founding as an online bookstore in 1995.

Besides signs, she said Amazon sends messages to workers’ phones and forces employees to attend meetings a couple of times a week that can go on for nearly an hour.

“The company would just hammer on different reasons why the union was bad for us,” Ms. Bates said. “If someone spoke up and disagreed with what the company was saying, they would just shut the meeting down.” The stakes are high for Amazon. If organisers succeed in Bessemer, it could set off a chain reaction across Amazon’s operations nationwide, with more workers rising up and demanding better working conditions.

Meanwhile, labour advocates are hoping a win at the Alabama facility could help push the labour movement in the South, which hasn’t been hospitable to organised labour.

But organisers face an uphill battle. Amazon, the second-largest private employer in the country, has a history of crushing unionising efforts at its warehouses and its Whole Foods grocery stores.

On March 17, Amazon.com Inc. didn’t deny that it hung signs in bathrooms or that it held mandatory meetings. Instead it said in a statement that it is following all National Labour Relations Board rules and guidelines in Alabama and that it respects employees’ right to form, join or not join a labour union.

The Seattle-based company also said it takes Ms. Bates’s feedback seriously, but doesn’t believe her comments represent other employees.

“We encourage people to speak with the hundreds of thousands of Amazon employees who love their jobs, earn at least $15 an hour, receive comprehensive healthcare and paid leave benefits,” the company said in a statement.

The nearly 6,000 workers at the Bessemer warehouse have until the end of March to vote on whether they want to unionise.

Big names have come out in support of the unionisation efforts, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, the independent from Vermont, and Stacey Abrams, the one-time Democratic candidate for Georgia governor who has become a leading voice on voting rights. Last week, Sen. Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, backed organisers as did Black Lives Matter. Most of the workers in the warehouse are Black, according to organisers.

Earlier this month, President Joe Biden released a two-minute video saying workers in Alabama and around the country had the right to unionise without intimidation from their companies, but he didn’t mention Amazon directly.

Ms. Bates, who testified virtually in the hearing on March 17 before the Senate Budget Committee, called working at the warehouse “gruelling” because of all the walking she has to do in the facility, which is the size of 14 football fields. Ms. Bates said she hoped the union would set more break times, force Amazon to treat workers with respect and pay more than the $15 an hour minimum the company currently pays.

“All we want is to make Amazon a better place to work. Yet Amazon is acting like they are under attack,” Ms. Bates said. “Maybe if they spent less time and money trying to stop the union they would hear what we are saying.”

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day’s newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

Personalised recommendations

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Faster pages

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

Dashboard

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

Briefing

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Question Corner: Did dogs migrate with humans to the Americas?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


(Subscribe to Science For All, our weekly newsletter, where we aim to take the jargon out of science and put the fun in. Click here.)

A bone fragment discovered from southeast Alaska has now answered a few questions on dog migration into the Americas. Researchers found that the thigh bone belonged to a dog that lived in the region about 10,150 years ago. Scientists say the remains represent the oldest confirmed remains of a domestic dog in the Americas.

Analysis of the mitochondrial genome revealed that the dog belonged to a lineage of dogs that diverged from Siberian dogs. Researchers (Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences) say in a release that this study provides not only the timing but also a location for the entry of dogs and people into the Americas. The study also supports the theory that this migration occurred just as coastal glaciers retreated during the last Ice Age.

The researchers from University of Buffalo, New York, who studied the bone say that canines did not arrive in the Americas all at once: some Arctic dogs arrived later from East Asia with the Thule culture, Siberian huskies were imported to Alaska during the Gold Rush and other dogs were brought by European colonizers.

The researchers did not set out to study dogs. They came across the femur fragment while sequencing DNA from a collection of hundreds of bones excavated years before in southeast Alaska by other researchers. The bone fragment, originally thought to come from a bear, was quite small, but when the DNA was studied, the team realised it was from a dog.

“Our early dog from southeast Alaska supports the hypothesis that the first dog and human migration occurred through the northwest Pacific coastal route instead of the central continental corridor,” Flavio Augusto da Silva Coelho notes in the release.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day’s newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

Personalised recommendations

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Faster pages

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

Dashboard

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

Briefing

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE