Permission for new private banks to participate in government business will be based on RBI guidelines: FM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Nirmala Sitharaman, during the Question Hour in the Rajya Sabha, said, “the RBI, being a regulator, has established norms and those norms will be applicable to the new banks.”

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday said in Parliament that permission to new private banks for conducting government-related business will be given under the RBI guidelines.

Ms. Sitharaman, during the Question Hour in the Rajya Sabha, said the government has now “only indicated” the RBI to allow other private banks to perform government-related business to ensure there is a level playing field.

“Now, following the existing norms based on which several banks have been given permission to do the business. So, those rules as per the RBI guidelines be applied on newer banks and new private banks which approach the RBI,” she said.

The RBI, being a regulator, has established norms and those norms will be applicable to the new banks, she added.

The Minister was responding to a query about whether the government will adopt any criteria to permit new banks for taking up government-related business.

Responding to another query by Shiv Sena leader Anil Desai that if public sector banks will weaken by allowing private banks to conduct government-related business, Ms. Sitharaman said some private banks and all public sector banks are doing this.

“Some customers are already benefiting from private banks from such services. The attempt now is to bring a level-playing field. Some private banks are already doing, all public sector banks are doing, why not extend to all private sector banks so that everybody gets an equal opportunity,” she explained.

This is being done because the business is growing and many more citizens are approaching the banks. As it was highlighted, the ease of doing business will have to be extended to all customers, she said.

Minister of State for Finance Anurag Singh Thakur said banks handle two kinds of businesses. One is the agency commission under which revenue receipts and payments on behalf of the Central and State governments and pension payments in respect of the Centre and State governments or any other item advised by the RBI is carried.

On the other hand, certain items fall under the work, which does not have the agency commission, but that has to be done by the bank such as furnishing of the bank guarantees and banking business, etc.

Stating that there is an increase in the share of private banks in the banking sector, Mr. Thakur said the deposit of the private banks has increased from 12.63% in 2000 to 30.35% now. The advances, too, have increased from a mere 12.56% to 36% now.

That apart, the share of the private sector in priority sector lending is rising. The private banks have given loans of ₹12.72 lakh crore, which is close to 50% of the priority sector lending.

During the COVID-19 period, private bank participation in the government’s emergency credit line guarantee scheme has gone up.

Under the scheme, the cumulative sanction from public sector banks was ₹95,261 crore, which was 38.22% of total lending. On the other hand, private sector bank lending was ₹1,28,297 crore, which was 51.5% lending of the emergency credit guarantee scheme. This clearly shows that the lending has gone up and their participation is more, he said.

Therefore, the decision to allow the private banks to undertake government-related business was taken for the betterment of consumers, ease of business and ease of living, he said, adding that this will enhance customer experience, enable innovation and latest technology that will help the business community and MSMEs.

“It will also lead to a spur of competition for higher efficiency,” the Minister added.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day’s newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

Personalised recommendations

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Faster pages

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

Dashboard

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

Briefing

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Petrol under GST: No proposal to bring petrol, diesel, ATF, gas under GST: Nirmala Sitharaman | India Business News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Amid record-high fuel prices, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Monday said there is no proposal as of now to bring crude oil, petrol, diesel, jet fuel (ATF) and natural gas under the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
When the GST was introduced on July 1, 2017, amalgamating over a dozen central and state levies, five commodities – crude oil, natural gas, petrol, diesel, and aviation turbine fuel (ATF) – were kept out of its purview given the revenue dependence of the central and state governments on this sector.
This meant that the central government continued to levy excise duty on them while state governments charged VAT. These taxes, with excise duty, in particular, have been raised periodically.
While the taxes haven’t come down, a spike in global oil prices on demand recovery has pushed petrol and diesel to an all-time high, leading to demand for them come under the GST.
“At present, there is no proposal to bring crude petroleum, petrol, diesel, ATF and natural gas under GST,” Sitharaman said in a written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha.
She said the law prescribes that the GST Council shall recommend the date on which the goods and services tax be levied on petroleum crude, high-speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas and ATF.
“So far, the GST Council, in which the states are also represented, has not made any recommendation for inclusion of these goods under GST,” she said.
The Council may consider the issue of inclusion of these five petroleum products at a time it considers appropriate keeping in view all the relevant factors, including revenue implication, she added.
Including oil products in GST will not just help companies set off tax that they paid on input but will also bring about uniformity in taxation on the fuels in the country.
Sitharaman has in recent weeks talked of inclusion of fuel under GST as well as centre and states taking a joint call on cutting taxes to cushion consumers against the spike in retail prices.
To a separate question, her junior in the finance ministry, Anurag Singh Thakur said excise duty on petrol was Rs 19.98 per litre a year back and is Rs 32.9 now. Similarly, on diesel, the excise duty has been raised from Rs 15.83 to Rs 31.8.
“The excise duty rates have been calibrated to generate resources for infrastructure and other developmental items of expenditure keeping in view the present fiscal position,” Thakur, minister of state for finance, said giving reasons for raising the levy.
On the impact of higher fuel rates on general prices, he said ‘petrol for vehicle’ inflation has increased from 7.38 per cent in January 2020 to 12.53 per cent in January this year.
Similarly, ‘diesel for vehicle’ inflation has increased from 6.44 per cent in January last year to 12.79 per cent this year, he said.
On fuel pricing, Thakur said the prices of petroleum products in the country are benchmarked to international product prices.
“Generally, the price of petroleum products in the country are higher/lower than other countries due to a variety of factors, including prevailing tax regime and subsidy compensations by the respective Governments,” he said.
The government ended subsidies on petrol in 2010 and on diesel in 2014. ATF pricing was freed in 2002.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

No new Rs 2,000 notes printed since 2019: MoS Anurag Thakur – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The government on Monday said that no new Rs 2,000 notes have been printed since April 2019, in an attempt to prevent its hoarding and curb the circulation of black money in the economy.
In a written reply in Lok Sabha, minister of state for finance Anurag Thakur said that printing of banknotes of a particular denomination is decided by the government in consultation the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to maintain desired denomination mix for facilitating transactional demand of the public.
“During the years 2019-20 and 2020-21, no indent has been placed with the presses for printing of Rs 2,000 denomination banknotes,” he said.
The move comes even as the quantum of the highest denomination currency note has reduced in the economy.
The minister informed the Parliament that 3,362 million currency notes of Rs 2,000 denomination were in circulation on March 30, 2018. However, as of February 26, 2021, only 2,499 million pieces of Rs 2,000 notes were in circulation.
While, currency in terms of volume reduced from 3.27 per cent to 2.01 per cent, that in terms of trade fell from 37.36 per cent in March 30, 2018 to 17.78 per cent in 2021.
Rs 2,000 notes came into circulation in November 2016 after the government announced demonetisation and withdrew notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 in an attempt to curb black money and fake currencies.
While a new Rs 500 note was printed, Rs 1,000 currency notes were discontinued. Instead, Rs 2,000 note was introduced.
In 2019, the RBI had stated that 3,542.991 million notes of Rs 2,000 were printed during the financial year 2016-17 (April 2016 to March 2017).
However, the number kept on reducing and only 111.507 million notes were printed in 2017-18, which further reduced to 46.690 million notes in the year 2018-19.
(With inputs from PTI)

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Anurag Thakur: Government to take care of job loss, other facilities in strategic divestment | India Business News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The government on Monday said that concerns related to job loss and other facilities will be taken care of when a central public sector company, working in a strategic sector, is divested.
Minister of state for finance Anurag Singh Thakur, during the Question Hour in the Rajya Sabha, said the government has a “clear and transparent” disinvestment policy.
Four sectors of atomic energy, space and defence; transport and telecommunications; power, petroleum, coal and other minerals; and banking, insurance and financial services would be strategic sectors. The rest will be non-strategic sectors, he said.
“If central public sector enterprises are given for privatisation or for strategic sale, in the sale purchase agreement to be entered, it will be decided that there won’t be job loss of people and all these facilities are provided,” Thakur said.
The minister further said he personally believes and the policy also clearly states that the divestment will bring investment, technology infusion, job opportunities.
“Overall, there will be more job opportunities and not reduction in employment,” he added.
The minister was responding to Samajwadi Party leader Vishambhar Prasad Nishad’s query on reservation and other facilities like provident fund in PSUs which would be privatised.
Nishad also asked a supplementary question on the number of PSUs that the government has formed since 2014 and created job opportunities for people.
The Union minister reiterated that the divestment policy is clear and transparent.
“In strategic sectors, at least one company we keep to run in the interest of the country. If there are many companies in a particular sector, then there is no need for the government to be in that business. The government has no business to be in the business,” he added.
For the 2021-22 fiscal, the government has kept the disinvestment target at Rs 1.75 lakh crore. Out of which, Rs 1 lakh crore is to come from selling government stake in public sector banks and financial institutions and Rs 75,000 crore would come as CPSE disinvestment receipts.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE