India vs England T20Is: England’s top 6 stronger than India’s, visitors the favourites to win series, says Monty Panesar | Cricket News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Team India are brimming with confidence. After winning the Test series against England 3-1, Kohli’s men are set to kick off their five-match T20I campaign against the English, starting today at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad. All five matches of the series are scheduled to be played at the same venue.
India and England have faced off 14 times overall in T20Is. The head to head is split right down the middle, with both teams winning seven matches each.
India captain Virat Kohli is the most-successful batsman in the India vs England rivalry in T20Is. The Indian run-machine has 346 runs in 12 matches, at an average of 31.45, including one half-century. England skipper Eoin Morgan is second on the list with 314 runs in 11 matches at an average of 31.40.
In the bowling department, Indian leg-spinner Yuzvendra Chahal tops the wicket taking charts in India and England T20I clashes. Chahal has so far taken 9 wickets in 6 matches, including one five-wicket haul.
With India set to kick start the five-match T20I series, Timesofindia.com caught up with former England spinner Monty Panesar to talk about the series favourites, the key clashes, England’s Test performance, Rishabh Pant‘s spectacular show in Tests and much more…
Excerpts…
After the Test series defeat, do you think England can turn things around and win the T20I series? Their T20 squad is very different in complexion to their Test squad….
England are the World No. 1 team in T20Is. The best part is that more than half of the team has played in the IPL. So, they know the conditions well. England are favourites to win the series. The only concern is their middle order and how they deal Yuzvendra Chahal, the leg-spinner, Axar Patel, Washington Sundar. The series will be dominated by spinners. It is a different format. England will bounce back strongly.

Who according to you will be the key players for India and England?
It will be England batsmen vs Indian spinners. England top’s six can take the game away from India. England’s top six is stronger than India’s top six. They have Dawid Malan, Eoin Morgan, Jonny Bairstow, Jos Buttler, and Ben Stokes. For India, Chahal, the leg-spinner will be crucial for India. He is a clever bowler and has got variations. He is the one who can stop the England batsmen. His four overs will be critical. If India wants to win, it depends on how Chahal’s four overs go. Chahal needs to bowl well if India have to win the T20I series.

Yuzvendra Chahal (BCCI Photo)
If you have to pick three key player battles in the T20I series, which will they be?
I would pick Kohli vs Morgan. That will be the all-captains clash. Second, David Malan vs Shikhar Dhawan. This will be an interesting combination. Because Malan is number one in the world. It will be great to see how he bats in these conditions and it will be interesting to watch. The third will be Moeen Ali or Adil Rashid vs Chahal.

What went wrong for England in the Test series?
I think it was because of the introduction of crowds, England couldn’t cope with the pressure and the noise. They did really well against Sri Lanka and performed very well. England won the matches when Joe Root scored big runs. So, what ends up happening is when Joe Root doesn’t score big runs, the team doesn’t know how to win on a turning pitch. England are totally dependent on Joe Root in Tests. That’s something that Joe Root and the team and the management need to sit down and think about. ‘If I’m not going to score runs, who else is going to score runs?’ Root should think this. They need to work on how to play spinners. Johnny Bairstow was a key player and he didn’t really perform.

Reuters Photo
India will now face New Zealand in the World Test Championship final. Who according to you are the favourites to win the inaugural WTC title?
Both the teams are strong and have done really well in Tests. It will depend on the pitch conditions. If it’s a turning wicket, then obviously India. There is no doubt about that. If it is flat and seaming, then New Zealand have got a chance.
Will defeat against India have any impact on the England team in how they play in the Ashes you think?
England have players who score runs and turn the game on its head. Playing spin is that weakness right now and they should work on it. What is this shot selection? What is the game plan against bowlers? This will be assessed against New Zealand when they come to England. If the same problems happen in England, then I think there’s quite a big issue. There is no harm in going to the basics. I think there is a need for the syllabus in level four and level three coaching, the way they teach to play spin. If Joe Root can bat like a subcontinent batsman, why can’t the others? That’s what I think they need to discuss. I think that that’s a problem.
I think the way we are taught to play spin, needs to be the way how subcontinent batsmen are taught, how the Indian batsmen (are taught) in India and that needs to be the part of the coaching (manual).
Axar and Ashwin dismantled the England line up single-handedly. Your take on that…
Axar is a great bowler, but in helpful conditions. He is a skillful bowler and takes wickets on turning pitches. Ashwin has done well in both home and overseas conditions. They were given a platform and they made full use of it with their skills, mind, and experience.

Axar Patel and R Ashwin (BCCI Photo)
How difficult will it be for Axar to retain his place in the Test team once Ravindra Jadeja returns?
Jadeja does well away from India. So, there’s no doubt about that. I think they should keep a close watch on Axar’s performance. Jadeja is a way better option with the bat. Patel may be a better spinner at home and on turning pitches. India can consider Axar at home and when they travel overseas, Jadeja should come in.
How would you rate Rishabh Pant’s performance in the Test series vs England? Is he doing enough to fill Dhoni’s shoes?

Rishabh Pant (BCCI Photo)
I wouldn’t say he’s Dhoni level, I would say he’s more Gilchrist. I think he’s more a Gilchrist type of cricketer. Major tournaments like T20 World Cup and then 50-over World Cup are coming up. So, we need to see how he performs. If India win the World Cup and Rishabh plays a huge part in that, then compare him with Dhoni. The coming time and tournaments are huge for Rishabh Pant. He will be tested.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Michael Vaughan warns Test cricket a ‘joke’ if England rotate in Ashes | Cricket News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON: Former captain Michael Vaughan fears Test cricket will become a “joke” if England rotate players in and out of their side during the 2021/22 Ashes in Australia.
England coach Chris Silverwood has suggested the team could continue with the controversial rest-and-rotation policy they used in Sri Lanka and India.
Joe Root’s team beat Sri Lanka 2-0 before losing their four-match series in India 3-1.
A number of players including Ben Stokes, Jofra Archer, Jos Buttler, Jonny Bairstow and Moeen Ali all missed matches at some stage of the tour programme.
Many observers felt the rotation policy made the already tough task of winning a series in India even more difficult.
But England are set to play a gruelling schedule of up to 17 Tests in 2021, as well as limited-overs matches including a Twenty20 World Cup.
Team management argue rotation is necessary to prevent player burnout, especially when so many fixtures will be played in bio-secure bubbles during the coronavirus pandemic.
“If they need rest, you get it before the Ashes,” Vaughan said on his BBC radio programme.
“Test match cricket is becoming a joke if that (players being rotated) happens. You make sure you get your best players available for every single Ashes Test match.”
Vaughan is also concerned by the possibility that players, including Buttler and Stokes, could miss the first Test against New Zealand at Lord’s on June 2, depending on how long their franchises are involved in the T20 Indian Premier League.
“This is where it gets frustrating for England supporters, and many in the game, that these players will go and play in the full IPL,” he said.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

India vs England: Rohit Sharma finally gets ‘consistent’ run after seven years | Cricket News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AHMEDABAD: Rohit Sharma has been considered one of the stalwarts of Indian batting for over a decade, but quite surprisingly this is only the second time in his 13-year international career that he has played six Tests in a row that India have played.
The first time this happened for Sharma was in late 2013 and early 2014 when he had made his Test debut after playing limited-overs cricket for six years.
Sharma played two Tests against West Indies in India, then flew to South Africa for two Tests and then went to New Zealand for two Test matches in 2013-14. After that, however, the batsman had been in and out of the Test side due to inconsistent performances.

Sharma’s first two Tests in 2013 produced centuries and set him on track to achieving greater heights, i.e. one who was ready to replace one of the Indian batting greats — Sachin Tendulkar, VVS Laxman, Rahul Dravid, and Sourav Ganguly — who had dominated the previous two decades.
However, things didn’t go the right way for Sharma and his next Test century came four years and 19 Test matches later in 2017 as he was in and out of the Test side.
Even that 2017 ton didn’t help Sharma cement his place in the Test side until the 2019 home Tests against South Africa saw him racking up big scores in a new role. He made 176 and 127 in Visakhapatnam and 212 in Ranchi against South Africa in three Tests.
Immediately after that, Sharma played a couple of Tests against Bangladesh and was almost looking like he would get to play six Test matches in a row when injury ruled him out of the New Zealand tour.
Sharma also couldn’t play the first two Tests in Australia in December but returned for the last two Tests and has now played in all four matches against England at home. The series has re-established him as India’s top batsman as he has handled tricky surfaces very well in the second and third Tests and helped India win.
As of now, Sharma is India’s leading run-scorer in the ongoing series with 304 runs and he could overtake Joe Root (338) on Friday as the leading scorer in the series for both teams.
“Rohit got runs because his shot selection was good. He played sweep shots, he played cover drive, he lifted the ball, played square cuts,” former India batsman and chief selector Anshuman Gaekwad told IANS.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

India vs England: Stokes was swearing at me, so Kohli intervened, says Siraj | Cricket News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AHMEDABAD: On a wicket where the Indian spinners bowled beautifully, pacer Mohammed Siraj picked the important wickets of England skipper Joe Root and Jonny Bairstow on the opening day of the fourth Test at the Narendra Modi Stadium on Thursday.
While Siraj was impressive with the ball, he was also involved in a verbal duel with England all-rounder Ben Stokes which also saw skipper Virat Kohli getting involved. Speaking after the end of the day’s play, Siraj said that Stokes was swearing at him and Kohli handled it well.

“He (Stokes) was swearing at me, so Virat intervened and handled that well,” Siraj said.
Tempers flared in the first session on Day 1 as Kohli and Stokes clashed in the middle with umpire Nitin Menon having to intervene. The chat between Kohli and Stokes heated up at the end of the 13th over.

Virat Kohli, left, interacts with Ben Stokes. (AP Photo
The Indian skipper was visibly unhappy with something Stokes said to Siraj and as a result, he decided to have a lengthy chat with the England all-rounder.
After the final ball of the 12th over, Stokes came down the wicket and he had a word with Siraj. Kohli was not happy with the turn of events and decided to take it up with Stokes. In the end, on-field official Menon had to intervene to separate Kohli and Stokes.

In the very next over, Siraj was also seen in an aggressive mood and he had a go at Stokes.
India bundled out England for 205 and then reached 24/1 at stumps on Day 1.
Commenting on his bowling effort, Siraj said: “We planned to bowl patiently and keep bowling at the same spot. Virat bhai told me that we have only two fast bowlers so we will keep rotating, and we will be well-rested. When I started bowling from the Reliance end, there was a little extra bounce and good movement from that end after I switched.”
“When I play in Australia or when I play here, I will put my effort on every ball otherwise it’ll affect the team, and it’ll release the pressure. I just want to bowl every ball giving my 100 per cent,” he added.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Everyone trained, all available for selection: Root downplays illness in England camp | Cricket News – Times of India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AHMEDABAD: England skipper Joe Root on Wednesday revealed that an illness hit the touring party earlier this week but all members of the squad trained ahead of the fourth Test against India here and are available for selection.
The English captain did not specify the nature of the illness but said he has a full squad to choose from.
“…the guys are fit and available for the game tomorrow. That gives us a little more time to name the squad,” Root said in the pre-match press conference.

“So, everyone in that way is as prepared as they would have liked it for the Test match,” he added.
Root said assistant coach Paul Collingwood was one of two members worse affected by the sickness.
India lead the four-match series 2-1 with the final Test slated to begin here at the Narendra Modi Stadium on Thursday.

[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

India vs England 2021: Decline in Test Batting, Pink Ball & Home Advantage More To Blame For Motera Two-Day Finish Than The Challenging Pitch

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India vs England: Jasprit Bumrah Pulls Out of Fourth Test Due to Personal Reasons

Why should India not make such pitches? As according to some archaic definition this is against the ‘Spirit of the Game’? And why is this a bad advertisement for Test cricket? When England produces green tops in seaming and swinging conditions or when South Africa and Australia produce fast and bouncy wickets where a sharp bouncer can actually hit and injure a batsman which has led to the concept of ‘concussion substitutes’ – why is that not against the spirit of the game?

Why is this self-righteous spirit only invoked when India plays to its home advantage? Also, Home Advantage has never been more advantageous ever before in the history of Test cricket than in the decade which just passed. There were 398 matches in the decade of which the home team won a whopping 212 for a win-loss ratio of 1.927 – the best for any decade in Test history. 1990s follow with a win-loss ratio of 1.775. India have been the most ruthless team at home in the 2010s and dominated the era like no other team before.

Another big reason why England became the first team in India to be bowled out for an aggregate of less than 200 in a match had nothing to do with the demons in the pitch but with deteriorating batting techniques in the five-day game after the advent of T20 cricket. Test cricket has no doubt become more interesting since 2010 with very few boring draws and with improbable high chases being pulled off on the final day – and credit to that has to be given to T20 cricket and especially the IPL where the best in the world lock horns against one another. Batsmen have become more daring, bold and more innovative. Shot-making has reached new heights and consequently the run-rate has also increased in ODIs and Test cricket.

But the downside of the emergence of T20 cricket and the mushrooming of several leagues all over the world is that on challenging wickets such as the one in the second Test in Chennai and Motera the batsmen are found wanting. The technique and defensive skill-set required for the five-day game is fast deteriorating. Batsmen all over the world do not have the patience to bide their time at the wicket, do the hard rounds, defend ball after ball and over after over – that art of old classic Test match batting is dying. It requires as much mental toughness and exemplary temperament as physical skill – these are attributes one does not associate with the T20 generation! Every young batsman wants to be a Chris Gayle. How many consider Cheteshwar Pujara as their role model?

Motera Flop Show: Will India Host Another Pink Ball Test? BCCI Not Convinced

This sentiment was summed up beautifully by the Indian captain, Virat Kohli after the two-day finish at Motera. “To be honest, I don’t think the quality of batting was up to standards. We were 100 for 3 and bowled out for less than 150. It was just that the odd ball was turning and it was a good wicket to bat in the first innings. It was bizarre that 21 of the 30 wickets fell to straight balls. Test cricket is about trusting your defence. Lack of application ensured it was a quick finish.”

From the 7th shortest to the 25th shortest Test matches (in terms of number of balls bowled) in Test cricket history, as many as 7 of them have come post 2010 – that cannot just be a coincidence! Four of the five shortest Test matches in India’s Test cricket history have come in the last three years. This includes the Lord’s Test in 2018 where India were bowled out for 107 and 130 and the home team won by an innings. There were no tweets on the unplayable pitch at the Home of Cricket then! Why the double standards? If India can collapse after batting poorly on a fast, swinging and seaming wicket against the likes of Anderson and Woakes in London why can’t England crumble to the brilliance of India’s spinners Ashwin and Axar Patel in helpful conditions in Ahmedabad? Why is Lord’s a test for the batsmen and Ahmedabad Frankenstein? Just for the record the Lord’s Test lasted for 1023 deliveries – not much longer than the one at Motera!

The only reasonable conclusions one can draw, from both the results, is the inability of the overseas batsmen to cope with the local conditions and wicket and an overall falling of standards in Test batting in the last 10 years or so. The batting average of the Top 5 batting positions in 2010s dropped to 38.41 from 40.47 in the previous decade. It has further gone down to 34.8 in the 2020s.

A third possible reason for India’s recent domination at home and the diminishing duration of matches is the lack of ability of the visiting batsmen and also of overall batting in general against quality spin bowling. England did not last till a second new ball in both the innings combined at Motera. India were themselves bowled out for 145 in the first innings. In as many as 23 innings post 2010 has a team been bowled out within 50 overs in India. Just for perspective this happened on just 4 occasions between 2001 and 2009. The difference is staggering and reveals the entire story!

Not surprising then that the average of spinners in India has improved from 34.59 in the 2000’s decade to 31.04 post 2010. The spinners have also dramatically improved their wicket-taking prowess with their strike rate improving from 70.6 to 62. Yes, the quality of Ashwin, Jadeja and some of the visiting bowler’s also has been outstanding but the failure of the batsmen against quality spin has also played its part too.

There is also the issue of the Pink Ball which has extra coats of lacquer, skids off the surface and comes at a deceptively higher speed causing all sorts of problems to the batsmen.

In conclusion, while the pitch at Motera was challenging and difficult it was by no measure impossible to bat on. And there is a reason it is called ‘Test’ cricket! Zak Crawley and Rohit Sharma – the two best batsmen in Ahmedabad – had both given a lesson on how to bat in tough conditions on a helpful track for the spinners. India made full use of their home advantage which was their prerogative. England had the better of the toss but batted poorly and the failure of their batting cannot be shifted to the pitch.

The way they crumbled and India’s collapse in the first innings was again a sign of the rapid decline of defensive batting in Test cricket with the batsmen not displaying enough patience to attach a price on their wicket – which is one of the big downsides of too much T20 cricket.

For way too long the Western countries, namely England and Australia have controlled the narrative in the sport. From the definition of the spirit of the game to what constitutes a good pitch. Well, the power center has shifted now. Brown, turning and spinning is as much a Test of your pedigree as green, swinging and seaming!





[ad_2]

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE